跪求一篇感人电影的英文影评，要原创!!!
Pride & Prejudice (2005)傲慢与偏见 凯拉奈特莉版The story is based on Jane Austen's novel about five sisters - Jane, Elizabeth, Mary, Kitty and Lydia Bennet - in Georgian England。 Their lives are turned upside down when a wealthy young man (Mr。 Bingley) and his best friend (Mr。 Darcy) arrive in their neig...全部
Pride & Prejudice (2005)傲慢与偏见 凯拉奈特莉版The story is based on Jane Austen's novel about five sisters - Jane, Elizabeth, Mary, Kitty and Lydia Bennet - in Georgian England。
Their lives are turned upside down when a wealthy young man (Mr。 Bingley) and his best friend (Mr。
Darcy) arrive in their neighborhood。Jane Austen's tale of love and economics reaches us once more with the energy of a thorough novelty。
"Pride and Prejudice" has been a favorite novel of mine since I first read it and I've seen Laurence Olivier and Greer Garson, Colin Firth and Jennifer Ehle and now Matthew MacFadyen and Kiera Knightly。
Amazingly enough I've never been disappointed。 The material seems to be full proof。 Colin Firth's Darcy, in many ways, is the Darcy I've always imagined。
He's been an actor I've followed feverishly since his glorious Adrian LeDuc in "Apartment Zero", Matthew MacFadyen was totally new to me but he managed to create that sense of longing that makes that final pay off so satisfying。
Kiera Knightly is a ravishing revelation。 I must confess, I didn't remotely imagined that she was capable of the powerful range she brilliantly shows here。
The other big surprise is Joe Wright, the director, in his feature film debut which is more than promising, it's extraordinary。
The photography, the art direction and the spectacular supporting cast, in particular Donald Sutherland and Brenda Blethyn, makes this new version of a perennial classic a memorable evening at the movies珍珠港的影评pearl harbour film reviewPearl Harbor consists of three incongruous acts, mashed together into an ungainly whole。
It appears to be more interested in reproducing the success of Titanic, which also set a fictional love story amidst a tragic historical event, than it is in telling the story of the men and women who fought and died in the attack on Pearl Harbor。
Titanic worked because the central characters were interesting, the story was cohesive, the historical events were handled respectfully and with the proper dramatic tone, and underneath it all was an intelligent reflection on the human failings that permitted such a tragedy in the first place。
Pearl Harbor reduces the historical backdrop into a series of action set pieces。 Instead of exploring ideas inherent in the events, it extracts them, reducing the reason for Japan's attack to something inexplicable at best, and having utterly nothing to say about why the attack happened, how it was carried out, or how we responded。
The film is dedicated to the men who died at Pearl Harbor, but what does it dedicate to them? It does not seem very interested in them except as a tool for dramatic imagery。
Consider, for example, a scene in which we learn that men are trapped in a sunken ship in the harbor。
We learn this to emphasize the brutality of the attack, as if such emphasis were needed。 Then the film forgets this point entirely, providing the fates of those men in a narrated line just before the closing credits。
Why wasn't the third act of the film about those men, instead of a rushed covering of the Doolittle raid on Tokyo, complete with overblown crash landings and an improbable engagement with Japanese soldiers?If you want to see a real movie about Pearl Harbor or the Doolittle Raid, one that paints a deep and accurate picture of what it was like, one you can learn from, one that pays tribute to our veterans, or even just one that functions as convincing entertainment, there is no shortage of options。
Tora! Tora! Tora! chronicles the events before, during, and after the attack from both the American and Japanese sides。
Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo is as thorough a chronicle of the Doolittle Raid as is probably possible in a feature film, while also following the personal stories of a few individuals involved (any one of which is more interesting than the personal story in Pearl Harbor)。
The Purple Heart, one of the most heartbreaking movies I've ever seen, tells the story of Americans captured by the Japanese after the raid。
Writing off the historical aspects of the film, I am left with the love triangle that makes up the entire first act and pervades the rest of it。
It is wholly uninteresting。 This same story has been told better, countless times before。 Not one of the three characters is fleshed out into an individual: they are bland stereotypes, dolled up to look pretty and given trite lines that they recite to convey the illusion of genuine emotion。
It's telling that it doesn't much matter to us how the love triangle is resolved。 Unless they both die, she'll get one of them, and who cares which? Neither of the men are personable, and we surely suspect early on that her decision will be based more on fate than her own volition anyway。
(In plots like this, it's survival of the survivors。) And so, alas, we are denied even the most basic of all elements of storytelling, namely, characters making actual decisions勇敢的心》Set in the late 13th century, 'Braveheart' is the story of one of Scotland's greatest national heroes Sir William Wallace。
leader of the Scottish resistance forces during the first years of the long, ultimately successful struggle to free Scotland from English rule。
。。Crucially charismatic in the title role, Gibson plays the heroic figure and emerges as a remarkable hero with wit and romantic soul, determined to rid his country of its English oppressors。
。。Wallace's revolution was set in motion, with great obstacles from his countrymen。。。 Many Scottish nobles lent him only grudging support as most of them were more concerned with wealth and titles than the freedom of the country。
。。 In fact, the Scottish leaders are in favor of revolt-or not-depending on English bribes。。。 Wallace, by comparison, is a man of honor, incorruptible and righteous。
。。 He was knighted and proclaimed 'guardian and high protector of Scotland,' but as much as he railed against the Scottish nobles, submitted to Edward I, King of England, he was astonished and in shock to discover the treachery of the leading Scot contender for the throne-Robert, the Earl of Bruce-to whom he confided , 'The people would follow you, if you would only lead them。
' Sophie Marceau is exquisite as the distressed princess Isabella of France who ends up falling in love with Wallace, warning him out of several traps。
。。Catherine McCormack is a stunning beauty who ignites Wallace's revolution。。。Patrick McGoohan is chilling, brutal, and vicious as the ruthless Edward I, known by the nickname 'Longshanks。
' This king remains simply the embodiment of evil。。。While Angus McFadyen moves as a nobleman torn between his conscience and political aspiration, and Brendan Gleeson brings strength and humor to his role as the robust Hamish, David O'Hara is very effective as the crazy Irishman who provides much of the film's comic relief from even the most tensed moments。
。。Mel Gibson has reason to be proud of 'Braveheart。' It is a motion picture that dares to be excessive。
。。 Gibson presents passionately the most spaciously impressive battles (yet staged for films) even excessively, and it is his passion and excess that make the motion picture great。
。。 The horror and futility of massed hand-to-hand combats are exciting rather repulsive。。。 It is epic film-making at its glorious best。
。。
Gibson's 'Braveheart' focuses on the human side of Wallace, a character so immense, so intelligent, and so passionate, exploring the definitions of honor and nobility, pushing us to follow the hero into his struggle against injustice and oppression。收起
