求一篇关于英国政府的英语文章求一篇关于英国政府的英语文章？
There are numerous benefits of embracing a written constitution in Britain。 In Britain there are many pressure groups, political figures and ordinary people who have faith in the aforementioned proposition。 Britain’s customary constitution is old fashioned, and there is not even a harmony about ...全部
There are numerous benefits of embracing a written constitution in Britain。 In Britain there are many pressure groups, political figures and ordinary people who have faith in the aforementioned proposition。
Britain’s customary constitution is old fashioned, and there is not even a harmony about what it really embody as it is made up of numerous etiquette, statute laws and very old recommendations。
Constitutions are supposed to be the fundamental social compacts by which authority and order are maintained。
Britain’s written constitution would not only provide a rigid means of protecting the people from the power of the executive, but also prohibit the Government from being unified。
Lately, this has been a major critique of the Government。 Even when Margaret Thatcher was Prime Minister, she determined that the Government power was too centralized, and required some sort of control。
A written constitution would set out the association among individuals and the Government。 It would define the authority of the state and its agencies, and say who can do what and where are the boundaries of power。
The British Government has been accused of decreasing its accountability through several agencies by permitting them to carry out Government policies without the agency directors being held responsible for their blunders。
A written constitution could check this mistake and make Parliament and democracy more answerable to themselves and the public。
Parliamentary reign is slowly dropping in Britain, and a written constitution would not only reduce Government sovereignty but also add to sovereignty of the electorate and the judicial system。
Presently, if the Government want to adjust or add to the unwritten constitution, they can do it easily by passing an Act。
This may imply that we have an elective dictatorship in theory where the Government exercises a supreme effect over Britain。
A resolute, firm written constitution would evolve more power into the people and the courts and disperse the sovereign powers of decision making and encouragement of the Executive。
This would be especially beneficial with Europe in mind。
With an unwritten constitution, the constitutional insurance is fragile and brittle。
A written constitution would allow the British people to appeal to the courts with a written document to back up their petitions。
An assorted document is a point of reference and the public will be able to read and grasp the constitution in a more reasonable manner。
A written constitution would not only increase their insight into politics but also encourage them to respect the laws included in the constitution。
Even though the introduction of a written constitution is viable, it would be extremely time consuming to blossom, particularly to the British taxpayers。
The written document would be produced from the present unwritten constitution, therefore it primarily should have the statute laws, conventions and common law that we already have, but written down and restrained from alterations。
One of the main rationale that indicated that UK should have a written constitution was to protect citizen’s privilege。
Generally, the British people are against radical change, and many people have shown uproar over devolution, the dissolution of hereditary peers, the Human Rights Act and many more topics。
There could not be anything much more radical than ushering a written constitution into Britain。
Presumably the main controversy, which would prevent a written constitution from being introduced into Britain, is the fact that it is simply unachievable。
It would not only be difficult to approach a consensus about who should decide and what the constitution should precisely contain, but also that there is no body who can warrant and legalize the introduction of a written constitution。
The Conservative Party have traditionally been in favor of keeping the unwritten constitution, and so when the vote takes place within the House of Commons and debates take place in the Tory-majority House of Lords, the outcome would presumably have a strong following opposing a written constitution。
Overall, there are also a huge number of motives opposing a written constitution, which would pose the country a lot of problems if Parliament decided to present one。
A convincing hint is that there may not be many skeptical aftereffects of introducing a written constitution, but as the present one works efficiently, there simply be no need for one。
The House of Lords has lost authority over the years, special with the New Labor government abolishing hereditary peers, so a written constitution may be able to recapture some of the lost authority。
This may particularly gratify the Conservatives, although the Lords have looked。收起
