我要用英语进行论文答辩，但我的英语翻译不地道。请热心网友帮忙把下面这篇论文翻译一下。多谢！
Marxist philosophy, epistemology of Political Science and Law Institute
马克思主义哲学 认识论 政法学院
Piaget's Genetic Epistemology and the practice of Marxist epistemology Comparison
Piaget's Genetic Epistemology and the practice of Marxist theory of knowledge in their respective areas of their own have mad...全部
Marxist philosophy, epistemology of Political Science and Law Institute
马克思主义哲学 认识论 政法学院
Piaget's Genetic Epistemology and the practice of Marxist epistemology Comparison
Piaget's Genetic Epistemology and the practice of Marxist theory of knowledge in their respective areas of their own have made indelible contributions to, the occurrence of basic knowledge from the psychological and physiological mechanisms in depth understanding of the process reveals the specific mechanisms, in-depth understanding of the specific process revealed in the main body of the initiative, the main understanding of the structure and cognitive ability to recognize the process that is the main endogenous factors。
The main contents are as follows: activity theory; adaptation theory; construct theory; Schema Theory; stage theory; equilibrium theory; factor theory; image theory。
Epistemology of practice outlines the comprehensive understanding of the nature of the process, insist on a thorough route dialectic materialism。
The main contents are: ontology theory; origin theory; constitute a theory; reflect the theory; standard theory; dialectical theory。
The two have much in common, there are many differences, have their respective advantages and shortcomings of their own。
Have in common: the main, object unity; the main, have an intermediary object unity; the main, the object of dialectic unity are the unity; Sublation experience both theory and rationalism。
Have a different point: the main, the object of a different uniform intermediary; the direction of the two studies are different; of the main research initiative, the former specific differentiation, the latter is more abstract; understanding of social factors, the former narrow emphasis on social factors in the latter; the former study recognize the occurrence of, pay attention to recognize the results of the latter; happened epistemology epistemology and practice are revealed at different levels recognize the scope of the process; the focus of the two are different; they plan to recognize and understand the process of the object of experience at different levels of importance; Thinking about the existence of both identity and proof of the problem on different Ways; questions on the truth about the differences; used two different basic areas。
Epistemology and practice of modern epistemology epistemology are two different levels, there are practical epistemology epistemology and deepening of the concrete。
Epistemology epistemology and practice happen binding to each other, promote each other。 The unification of the two reflects the modern understanding of the process of human understanding of the modern, but also the practice of epistemology can be seen as a new stage of development, a new level。
In recent years, the scientific development in the number of branches, resulting in cross-interdisciplinary composition, the actual combined total of the two questions, so the area of a theory of knowledge, "hybrid。
" I happened to Jean Piaget's theory of knowledge and practice of Marxist theory of knowledge compared to the hybridization between the two can be seen as "hybrid" has obvious advantages, are assimilated to each other, not only will not harm the subjects studied the uniqueness of the situation , but also rich in both simultaneously。
皮亚杰的发生认识论与马克思主义的实践认识论之比较
皮亚杰的发生认识论与马克思主义的实践认识论各自在自己的领域作出了不可磨灭的贡献，发生认识论从心理基础和生理机制方面深入地揭示了认识过程的具体机制，深入具体地揭示了认识过程中主体的能动性、主体的认识结构和认知能力，即认识过程中主体的内源性因素。
主要内容有：活动理论；适应理论；建构理论；图式理论；阶段理论；平衡理论；因素理论；形象理论。实践认识论全面地概括了认识过程的本质，坚持了彻底的辨证唯物主义的路线。主要内容有：本体理论；本源理论；构成理论；反映理论；标准理论；辩证理论。
二者有许多共同之处，又有许多相异之处，有各自的优点，又有各自的缺点。共同点有：主体、客体相统一；主体、客体相统一都有一个中介；主体、客体相统一是辨证的统一；二者都扬弃了经验论与唯理论。不同点有：主体、客体统一的中介不同；二者研究的方向不同；对主体能动性研究，前者具体辨证，后者比较抽象；对社会因素的理解，前者狭窄，后者重视社会因素； 前者研究认识的发生，后者注重认识的结果；发生认识论与实践认识论是揭示认识过程不同层次的范畴；两者的侧重点不同；二者对认识图式和客体经验在认识过程中的重视程度不同；二者关于思维与存在同一性问题的论证方法上不一样；关于真理问题上的差异；二者所用的基本范畴不同。
发生认识论与实践认识论是现代认识论中的两个不同层次，发生认识论是实践认识论的具体化和深化。发生认识论与实践认识论相互制约，相互促进。二者的统一体现了人类对现代认识过程的现代了解，也可以看作是实践认识论发展的新阶段、新水平。
近年来，科学发展中的分支学科增多，产生学科间的交叉组合，实际组合了两者共有的问题，于是出现了认识论领域的“杂交”。我对皮亚杰的发生认识论与马克思的实践认识论的比较，可以看作两者的杂交，“杂交”具有明显的优势，是相互的同化，不但不会损害各学科所研究的现象的独特性，而且可以同时丰富两者。
收起
